Building a Strong Mind: Why Stoicism Starts with Logic

Discourse 1.17 ( Part 1)

Photo by Mirella Callage on Unsplash

So in reading this discourse I feel it has two distinctive ideas, the first is the importance of logic, the second, the need to use logic assent to things yourself rather than be guided by others commentaries. In this post, I’ ll concentrate on the first idea.

Discourse 1.17

That the art of reasoning is necessary.

Since it is Reason which shapes and regulates all other things, it ought not itself to be left in disorder; but by what shall it be regulated? Evidently, either by itself, or by something else. Well, either that too is Reason, or something else superior to Reason, which is impossible; and if it be Reason, what again shall regulate that? For if this Reason can regulate itself, so can the former; and if we still require any further agent, the series will be infinite and without end.

" But," say you, " the essential thing is to prescribe for qualities of character."

Would you hear about these, therefore? Well, hear. But then, if you say to me that you cannot tell whether my arguments are true or false, and if I happen to express myself ambiguously, and you bid me make it clearer, I will then at once show you that this is the first essential. Therefore, I suppose, they first establish the art of reasoning, - just as before the measuring of corn, we settle the measure; for, unless we first determine the measure and the weight, how shall we be able to measure or weigh? Thus, in the present case, unless we have first learned and fixed [p. 1060] that which is the criterion of other things, and by which other things are learned, how shall we be able accurately to learn anything else? How is it possible? Well, a bushel-measure is only wood, a thing of no value, but it measures corn; and logic is of no value in itself. That we will consider hereafter, but grant it now; it is enough that it distinguishes and examines, and, as one may say, measures and weighs all other things. Who says this? Is it only Chrysippus, and Zeno, and Cleanthes? Does not Antisthenes say it? And who is it, then, who has written that the beginning of a right education is the examination of words? Does not Socrates say it? Of whom, then, does Xenophon write, that he began by the examination of words, what each signified?

…

Source

Stoicism crowns reason as the master craftsman of the soul. Epictetus reminds us that before we tackle courage, justice, or self‑control, we must fix our tool of measurement—our reasoning itself. Imagine trying to weigh grain with a warped bushel. You’d never know the truth. Likewise, if your mind’s measure is loose––confused definitions and slippery arguments––you’ll never learn anything consistently, let alone live wisely.

Reason governs all: sensations, impressions, impulses, and judgments. But left unchecked, it spawns endless doubt. Who regulates the regulator? Epictetus cuts through that loop: reason regulates itself. Logic becomes our internal bushel—no flashy reward, just reliable accuracy. With it we can weigh claims about life, death, desire, and duty.

You cannot build virtue on shaky foundations of thought.

Socrates began education by querying words. Chrysippus turned Stoic theory into clear definitions. Today, cognitive science shows that precise definitions and clear thinking guard against bias and confusion. When you pause to examine a label or a claim, you’re doing Stoic logic in action.

Only after mastering this art of clear thought can you move on to the Stoic’s real goal: living in harmony with nature’s rational order. Logic is the gatekeeper to freedom. Without it, we’re adrift in other people’s arguments or our own untested assumptions. With it, we stand firm in the citadel of our own reason—ready to choose virtue in every moment.

Do I have to study logic?

Modern Stoics don’t need a Ph.D. in symbolic logic. What they do need is a practical toolkit for clear thinking—an ability to notice shaky premises, to follow an argument step by step, and to catch internal contradictions before they hijack their judgments.

If you are fortunate enough to have encountered a degree-level course some of this logic will have been part of your education ( hopefully), though perhaps not as outlined below. Usually included under the umbrella term critical thinking. My advice, start somewhere and increase you knowledge over time.

A possible Logical base to begin with:

1. Basic Argument Structure
   • Learn the forms of valid inference—e.g.
   – Modus Ponens (“If P then Q. P. Therefore Q.”)
   – Modus Tollens (“If P then Q. Not Q. Therefore not P.”)

   
   • Recognize informal fallacies—ad hominem, false cause, equivocation, slippery slopes—so you don’t tacitly accept them in conversation or social media debates.

2. Premise Checking
   • Practice asking, “What evidence supports that claim?” and “Is there an alternative explanation?”

   
   • In Stoic terms, interrogate your impressions—the automatic beliefs that arise in you—before granting them assent.

3. Clarifying Definitions
   • Echoing Socrates: start by defining your terms (“What exactly do I mean by ‘virtue,’ ‘happiness,’ or ‘control’?”).

   
   • Use precise language to forestall confusion and to make your own values explicit.

4. Testing Assent
   • Build a short “pause-and-question” ritual whenever a strong emotion hits:
   – “Is this within my control / up to me?”
   – “What am I assuming?”
   – “Is my reaction based on fact or fear?”

   
   This mirrors the Stoic practice of pre‑meditation and evening reflection, but with a logical twist.

5. Cognitive Behavioral Tools
   • Borrow from modern CBT: keep a thought record to spot cognitive distortions (all‑or‑nothing thinking, catastrophizing, personalization).

   
   • Link each distortion back to Epictetus idea of what is or isn't up to you, to see how false premises fuel unhealthy emotions.

In a nutshell: modern Stoics should learn critical thinking, informal logic, and premise evaluation—all geared toward maintaining a clear, disciplined mind. That way, when life’s storms blow in, they won’t lose sight of where true agency lies.

I have written previously on Stoics and Logic (Previous post: Be Reasonable) but think this post is a bit more succinct.

Your thoughts? :

When was the last time you caught yourself acting on autopilot—and paused to question your own assumptions? How might mastering the “art of reasoning” change your response?

---

Tip / Donation/ Appreciation

We are all living in a cost-of-living crisis, and I find Substack’s paid scheme too much of a hassle. If you feel inclined to throw cash appreciation my way, you can buy me a block of chocolate through my Kofi link here.